Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Snape Victorious ~ As A Human Being

  • Jul. 25th, 2007 at 10:00 AM
Snape-Sun
This is a public post, and this is long. 

I truly love Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, even though I have been weeping at odd times of the day when I recall certain scenes. I'm sure I will be grieving for a long time to come. The Life and Love of Severus Snape affected more deeply than anything I've ever read - it's just a beautiful story of a man who always had enormous obstacles to overcome, who was despised by both sides of the fight in the Wizarding World, and who had to struggle with his own dark impulses since childhood. But there was one salvation for him - he had a friend named Lily Evans who understood him and made his life worthwhile.  And that made all the difference.

And the love of Severus Snape for Lily Potter transformed him from a teenage death eater into a Potions Master and friend of Albus Dumbledore, as well as a Super Double Agent in the War against Lord Voldemort.  After returning to the good side, filled with remorse over telling the Prophecy to his Master, Snape's main goal in life became the protection of Lily and her son, Harry Potter.  He could not save the woman he loved, but he kept trying to save "Lily's son," a boy with whom he had a difficult and rocky relationship.  In life, Snape never spoke Lily's name to Harry, but in death, he gave the boy the greatest gift of all - his memories of Lily.

Harry had hated Snape till then, and had never understood what Snape sacrificed on his behalf, nor the risks Snape took every time he went back to the presence.  Voldemort could have killed Snape at any time, as he finally decides to do.  The lowly Shrieking Shack, where Snape had nearly died as a boy from a werewolf attack, became his tomb, and Harry and Hermione watch him die, saving his memories at the last minute.  His last request?  "Look at me."  Did Snape wish to see the green eyes that always reminded him of Lily?  Or did he want Harry to see him as he really was, without the blinding hate that separated them in life?  I think both. *weeping again, sorry*

Two chapters in Deathly Hallows make it a classic for all time:  "The Silver Doe" and "The Prince's Tale." 

The Silver Doe is Snape's beautiful patronus, the symbol of his never-ending love, and the symbol of Lily.  It is the Silver Doe which leads Harry through the forest to the pool with the Sword of Gryffindor, which Ron uses to break one of the vile horcruxes of Lord Voldemort.  In his memories, Dumbledore is surprised that Snape's Patronus is still the doe "after all these years."  Snape's simple reply, "Always" is one of the most powerful one word sentences in all of literature, capturing years of sadness and longing in one word.

The Prince's Tale unfolds the story of Snape's life from his memories in the Pensieve.  We see him as a young boy, meeting Lily for the first time on the playground.  He wears odd clothing similar to the Little Prince by Exupery - a huge man's coat and a strange smock-like shirt.  Something antique, perhaps, from the wizarding world, passed down by his Princely ancestors?  At any rate, he is a complete parallel to Harry, whom we are told in Book One wears hand-me-down clothes that are too big for him, and who was also a neglected child.  

The memories follow Snape through the years, boarding the Hogwarts Express and becoming an immediate target of James Potter and Sirius Black, enduring the torture of Snape's Worst Memory and being hung upside down and depantsed, trying to make up with Lily after that day, apologizing for calling her a "Mudblood."  But they came to the parting of the ways that day.  Though Lily agrees that they are best friends, she doesn't like his young Death Eater friends, and he doesn't like the Marauders.  Lily says she doesn't like James, but later marries him.  When she is pregnant with Harry, Snape finds out she is a target of Voldemort due to information he provided about the Prophecy, and he begs Dumbledore to protect her.  When asked what he is willing to do in return, Snape says, "Anything."

And that's the key - he would do anything, and he would do if "always."  He never changed and he never wavered - Severus was a hero.  He was not perfect, and he was often resentful, and therefore we can see that he was in some ways a tragic hero, gothic hero, anti-hero - call him any and all of those.  But we know that Harry thought he was brave, and over the years perhaps began to love the memory of him.  Harry and Ginny's second son is called "Albus Severus," and Harry tells the boy that Snape "was probably the bravest  man I ever knew."  In a series filled with brave Gryffindors, to have the hero of the story giving that sort of praise to anyone is an amazing moment.  It's the real moment when Snape is Victorious - as a human being.

Fandom's Reaction, and a Comment:

It's an interesting thing about HP Fandom.  Whenever someone doesn't like part of the canon, they immediately trash the author as a bad writer, or they say they could write these characters better than she can because she "doesn't understand them."  

So how are people responding to the new information about Severus Snape, the "bravest man" Harry ever knew, and someone who loved Lily Potter in a pure and beautiful way represented by his "shining" patronus?

As usual, they are in denial, rewriting the book to suit themselves, and bashing JKR for daring to include the friendship between Snape and Lily Evans. 

Examples:
Why did this come "out of nowhere"?  
Snape's so-called "love"  couldn't have been anything but something dirty and disgusting, even at nine years old. 
His love was not "pure enough" because he was "obsessed" with Lily.  
His remorse upon her death is "not enough" to vindicate him.  
He never really tried to save Harry - he hated Harry because he hated James. 
He called her a "Mudblood" and that's unforgivable.  
He hates all women because he made a remark about Hermione's teeth once, and that's unforgivable too.
She must have copied some Sniveller's Fan Fic.
How dare JKR "trash" the Marauders by "elevating" Snape to such a status in Book 7!  
It's so disrepectful of to have Harry name his second son Albus Severus and not "Sirius" after the godfather who loved him!  
Isn't it creepy that Snape loved a married woman who has been dead for years?  
Doesn't that show how twisted and demented he was, and what a greasy, slimeball git he was?  
Snape was really a "snake" and the "perfect Slytherin.," 
He was out for himself and never in love with anybody.

*sigh*

I really feel sorry for these readers, who missed the entire point of Snape as a character.  It's nothing new, but has been happening since OotP, when fans disagreed over the chapter called "Snape's Worst Memory."  People upset by the death of Sirius Black, were furious when some of us criticized the actions of the Marauders when they attacked Snape. Many fans thought the unprovoked attack was funny  - I doubt they are laughing now. 

Many people - you know who you are - have spent years personally attacking the Snape fans for thinking he was a good character who tried to help Harry.  They never understood the idea of point of view - that we as readers saw everything through Harry's eyes, or though the words of characters who did not like Snape anyway.  Now we know that both Sirius and Lupin edited their view of Snape, leaving out the friendship with Lily that they must have known about - the "reason" that Snape was a "special case" for James.  They knew about Snape and Lily on the first train to Hogwarts, but we didn't know that till now.  It wasn't about Snape being "into the Dark Arts" at all! It wasn't about some stupid life-debt with James!

Snape loved Lily and he was brave. Dumbledore even implied that Snape should have been in Gryffindor House, which would have possibly meant that Harry would have been his son, and there wouldn't have been a Lily/James at all.  And if the Prophecy still applied to Harry, then Snape would have done a damn good job of protecting them better than James/Sirius/Peter ever did.

I'm sure that infuriates many fans also - How dare she write that a Slytherin can be brave!  *eyeroll*  What they forget is that we have a Cowardly Gryffindor - Peter Pettigrew.  So why not the opposite?

To all the fans out there who still don't "get" the importance of Severus Snape in Deathly Hallows, I will just say I'm sorry for you.  The Snape fans have been pointing out clues for years, and if you hadn't been so intent on arguing or getting us into trouble, you might have been more prepared for Book 7.  JKR knows fandom - she knew that some of you would "loathe" the book, while others would feel vindicated.  

I certainly feel vindicated.  Not all of my theories came true, but by the time the book arrived I just wanted some clue that Snape was truly good, and we were blessed with this beautiful backstory that cannot be denied.  Thanks so much, JKR - I love you even more now than ever!

People will keep trying to discredit the story of Snape and Lily, but I have to ask: "What part of the name Albus Severus do you not understand?"







Page Content

free hit counters

Comments

[info]lemon_ashwinder wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 03:49 pm (UTC)
Thanks for this, rattlesnakeroot.
I feel vindicated too. I didn't have very many pet theories that I was clinging to, except that of Snape's extreme heroism. I never wavered in my belief in him, except during that first emotional reading of the Astronomy Tower. My hope was that Snape would survive and that he and Harry would have to learn to deal with each other in the light of the truth, but I never really expected it. The fact that Harry does come to understand, respect and care for Severus Snape is sweet to me. You're right, Albus Severus says it all.

The reaction of those readers who not only continue to despise and vilify Snape, but now say terrible things about Dumbledore, is pretty horrifying. Is it too much fan fiction? The failure of modern education to teach young people to read with real comprehension? I don't know. My 12-year-old was shocked and deeply moved by Dumbledore's and Snape's stories. Their goodness is there to be seen, except by those who refuse to open their eyes to the author's intent.

I loved this book very, very much. The best of the series and one I'll always treasure. After all the red herrings and clever evasions, JK Rowling lays bare the hearts and history of her characters and they ring true. They're real with all their flaws and splendidly consistent in all their human inconsistencies. Hmmm… saying that makes me think of Jane Austen, another favorite author who writes characters brilliantly.

I hope that as more people have time to re-read and recover from the loss of their pet theories they'll have more appreciation for this marvelous story. There are so many splendid layers to it that I'm happy to know we'll keep on discussing it for a long time to come.
[info]freggythepod wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 04:23 pm (UTC)
That was very moving...*hugs*
I think that Severus is truly heroic for many things, not the least of which is his growth. By the end of "The Prince's Tale", he is a much better man than he started out as, and I applaud him for it.

The trouble with Fandom-- and the world in general, really, is that people only see what they want to see. While canon tells us that Snape evolved into a noble man who learned to truly love Lily and respect what she lived and died for, people just won't see it if they don't want to. It's no longer a question of what Harry and his Filter feels, it's a question of the readers' emotions.
I find it rather sickening, considering the fact that as Severus lay dying on the floor of the Shrieking Shack, he still knew he had to fulfill Dumbledore's orders. He died doing the right thing and looking once again into Lily's eyes. I would slowly back away from anyone who wasn't moved by that.
[info]orthoclase wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 04:40 pm (UTC)
I was naive when I started in the fandom. I though it was obvious that the Marauders were the aggressors in SWM, that it was obvious that Snape was a good person, and that there was some reason Snape never brought up Lily. Instead, I found myself arguing about these simple facts, until it hit the point of war.

To me, Snape has been vindicated and if there are fans out there who can't see it, it is because they have a problem. They could have listened to us, we've been trying to show them for years.

They are saying all of this because they are mad that they are wrong. They missed the obvious. It is their loss if they missed one of the most beautiful stories of all time because it wasn't the story they wanted.
[info]alwaysholly wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 05:20 pm (UTC)
Wonderful way to sum up the book and you brought tears to my eyes. The book leaves with no doubt the importance of Snape's character. His redemption, his heroic actions, his love for Lily that never waivered and went on for years.

Snape is the true Gothic Hero as well as a tragic hero. The Prince's Tale was so incredibly moving that it left me in tears.

Snape's story is the sad story of a neglected misguided teen who made horrible choices but overcame them out of love. A beautiful redemption.

I am depressed with the fandom. It is sad that JKR can write something and have it severely misinterpreted. I thought that she brought so much closure to the topic of Snape. Leaving no doubt that he was a redeemed hero.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some fans will still clutch at straws because they hate the ending. I have seen some posts that basically say in nice words that JKR is a hack. I just hope she doesn't log on to any of the fan sites and see that. Truly insulting for any author.

I am just glad to be vindicated in my beliefs. It helps prove to me that I was reading correctly and on the right track. I have been basically called stupid for some of my ideas. I am just happy to see that was not the case.

Thank you JKR.
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 05:23 pm (UTC)
Thank you all for your comments!

Like the rest of you, I wonder about the state of humanity and compassion in Harry Potter fandom. I know one thing - I'm not planning to spend the rest of my time in Fandom explaining the word "love" to people who don't have a clue what that means.
[info]hagathachristie wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 06:30 pm (UTC)
Fabulous post!

For the most part, I just scroll past those who just don't have the capacity to "get" it. I have though delighted in every post I've seen where the poster laments how wrong they were about Snape and how it's all so clear to them now that he really was a hero.

Like many, I had some theories that didn't pan out, but I'm well-pleased with the beautiful story we've been given.
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 06:46 pm (UTC)
Yes, you are right Hagatha, that at least a majority of people now see the truth about Snape's character, and will be cut him some slack when they read the series again. I hope alot of the readers, especially the kids, learn something about appearance and reality. Look beyond the hair and nose, children.

I was reading the Silver Doe again, and realized that the sneakoscope doesn't go off when Snape is outside the tent! Ron is out there in the woods, too, so it sees Ron and Snape both as friends. That makes me happy.
[info]alwaysholly wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 07:00 pm (UTC)
Yeah I noticed that when I read that chapter again last night and I thought that was a nice hint.
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 07:35 pm (UTC)
It's the same reason the Marauders Map won't open for Snape - he is "up to good." : )

I used to post that occasionally and people would laugh me out of existence. However, JKR confirmed it in HBP when Harry had to tell the Map that Draco was up to no good, even though Harry was "up to good." *lol*

It's also the same reason we never saw Crookshanks react negatively to Snape in the Shack. If he had been "bad" in PoA, wouldn't Crookshanks have attacked him or scratched him?
[info]freggythepod wrote:
Jul. 25th, 2007 08:46 pm (UTC)
I supposed, but others could argue in the opposite direction about Buckbeak attacking Severus in "Flight of the Prince". The animal clues go either way, I think...or, actually, they appeared to go either way. Now we have the final word in book 7. >:3
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 12:46 am (UTC)
You're right, Freggy - Buckbeak is problematic because he does seem to attack Snape, but only when Snape finally "lashes" Harry. I wondered in my hippogriff essay whether Buckbeak is chasing Snape away for his own good, since the aurors are about to arrive. Or is Buckbeak lashing out because Snape wasn't telling Harry the truth and was pretending to be a loyal DE? It could go either way for me.
[info]freggythepod wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 01:36 am (UTC)
I always assumed that Buckbeak attacked because of the strong loyalty he felt for Harry. I think a dog might attack if its owner is hurt, so Buckbeak may not have been different.

Though I do like the idea that Buckbeak was trying to chivvy Snape off the grounds. Did he notice, I wonder, that Harry was distracting Snape?
[info]ms_arithmancer wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 05:30 am (UTC)
I have nothing to add to your comments about how beautiful and moving the Snape story's devastating conclusion was in DH. It still amazes me, especially in a book that is paced with so many other emotional moments.

As far as fan reactions go...Rowling has said it better than I could.

"You see what you expect to see."
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 06:07 am (UTC)
AMEN!, Ms.Arithmancer!

That says it all, doesn't it?

[info]cr_the_mighty wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 08:26 am (UTC)
Brilliant post. I was so freaking happy to read "The Prince's Tale" and have Snape finally vindicated. Harry got it, and he's misunderstood Snape for 6 and 3/4 books! He told everyone, including Voldy to his snakey face, that Snape loved Lily! He named his kid after him! Ginny had to have agreed, no? Harry said Snape was "the bravest man I ever knew"!!

And yet people still don't get it. to these people, I kindly recommend they read teh bleeding books again. AS THEY ARE WRITTEN. And stay away from the fanfics while you do so.

Oh, and get over yourselves. Jo's a brilliant author, and I'm not just saying that because Snape's good, yay. A ton of my theories were off. But DH was BRILLIANT. The Harry Potter series will go down in the annals of history as a classic of literature. You're watching history being made, and all you can do is whine about how the mean greasy git loved a dead chick. Yeah, good on ya. *sarcasm clap*
[info]cr_the_mighty wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 08:27 am (UTC)
Er, that last paragraph was to the idiots who don't understand what's spelled out for them. Not for you guys. You actually got it.
[info]corvus_coronis wrote:
Jul. 26th, 2007 01:07 pm (UTC)
"What part of the name Albus Severus do you not understand?" - I'd prefer "Severus Albus" myself, but I've been enormously biased towards Snape from the start, as you know. A great review, both of the book & of the fandom's reactions to it, mind if I link it in my journal?. I've also added my share of questions to the upcoming Bloomsbury chat, I just sincerely hope that she does say that there's a portrait of him in there somewhere... I think I'd practically die all over again if there wasn't X(

Btw, a nice DH Canon art rec (PG, Work Safe, one of the Pensieve scenes) I saw someone link - it's by [info]ravingartist & it's here
[info]rattlesnakeroot wrote:
Jul. 28th, 2007 08:44 pm (UTC)
Corvus: Feel free to link that wherever you like! It's public.
[info]corvus_coronis wrote:
Jul. 29th, 2007 01:06 am (UTC)
I will later, when I've get more internet time :)
[info]ex_peignoir991 wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 11:59 pm (UTC)
"What part of the name Albus Severus do you not understand?"

The Albus part!

(kidding, but only partly).

I think it says something that the kid was Albus Severus and not Albus Sirius. Not that I take Harry's verdict as the definitive judgment on the events of the book, though.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow