The other day, I posted a comment from the writer Karen Brown, author of Prejudice in Harry Potter. I had originally seen the comment on Kristin Devoe's Daily Prophet blog, and I posted it Here in a discussion of Tim Wu's New Yorker Article.
I did not know Ms. Brown, but I wrote an e-mail to her inviting her to comment further, which she did. I never meant to drag her into a huge controversy or cause problems for her in any way, and I am so sorry. I have quoted dozens of bloggers in the past few months to show different views, and several of them have decided to comment here with no drama.
I was just trying to give a balanced view of the case, since I have been criticized for my own bias. I felt that Ms. Brown had a refreshing view, since she is a fan and supporter of J. K. Rowling, but was wishing that fandom would tone down their criticism of Steve Vander Ark and let the legal system decide the fate of his book.
But due to unfortunate things that have been said in the past few days, Ms. Brown has been drawn into some accusations and threats, both public and private. She feels her statement is being misconstrued and her views distorted. This has caused her a great deal of distress, and she decided to state her own view in a public setting. Therefore Karen has put out a Press Release:
Caught on the Wrong Side of Harry Potter Fandom
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
determined - Music:The Who: "I Can See For Miles"
- Location:Home
- Mood:
loved - Music:Beatles "Lady Madonna"
"Week of Wu."
Just for the record, let's remind ourselves of who he is.
He does NOT work with the Stanford Fair Use Project attorneys who are representing RDR books in the Lexicon lawsuit.
Tim Wu is a Columbia Law Professor and writer. Last week he led part of a panel discussion in New York called "OnCopyright 2008." That is his field of interest, and yes, he has strong opinions. Everyone should already know that because he wrote an Article for Slate in January entitled "J.K. Rowling's Dark Mark: Why she should lose her copyright lawsuit against the Harry Potter Lexicon." That's a very simple, straight-forward title. So it shouldn't be a secret that he has an opinion about this case.
However, when he wrote the short vignette in the New Yorker entitled Fan Feud , it caused quite a stir, as my readers know (see the past few entries for details). He also wrote a follow-up on his blog What's New With Wu in which he restated his view.
Some in Fandom feel his article was a cheap shot at people who are already upset. For instance, Sue, one of the regulars on Leaky Cauldron's Pottercast who was actually quoted in Wu's now famous vignette has now blogged about her feelings: The Elephant in the Room.
An alternate view to that is a comment written on Kristin Devoe's Blog "The Daily Prophet" in reference to the New Yorker story. Karen Brown author of the book Prejudice in Harry Potter's World wrote her own opinion of the Leaky Lounge, deleted posts, sympathy for Steve Vander Ark, and the so-called impartiality of fandom. I think she speaks for many of us who are still Harry Potter fans, and who are not personally involved, but still have a right to our alternative opinions.
Tonight an interesting encounter on Leaky in which Melissa accused the poster kbnthomas of being Karen Brown, and demanded a retraction of the comment posted above. About the deletions - many people who support Steve Vander Ark have been deleted on Leaky. I don't see how we can "prove" that now, since the posts are, by definiton, gone. If Melissa wants to open up her logs for a day and let us see the names of the people deleted in the past three months, that might convince me, so I would urge her to "prove" that we haven't been deleted.
- Location:Lake Wu-Begone
- Mood:
working - Music:Neil Young: "Rockin' in the Free World
The last two days have been . . . well . . . let's just say I'm tired of typing.
So here's a post just for fun because unless there is major breaking news,
I may take tomorrow off from the Blog-o-sphere.
.
First we have "Mr. Bill Goes to Court" from Saturday Night Live.
Next: From Buffy the Vampire Slayer ~
Spike Sings a Song
- Location:home
- Mood:
tired - Music:Spike: "Let Me Rest In Peace"
Wu Writes:
"Unsurprisingly, the fan reaction has been visceral, in all sorts of directions. I particularly like being compared to Rita Skeeter. Obviously there is much more I would have liked to have put in - there were hours of interviews, and great contributions from Sheryll Townsend that were cut in their entirely to my dismay. But overall the thrust of the article was to describe the feud over Steven Vanderark in fandom, and his punishment therein.
Ironically, the article itself seems to have led to even more feuding in fandom.
Melissa Anelli in particular feels she has been misrepresented; though I am not sure I see why. Briefly, I mention and quote language to the effect that her and other leaders in fandom have been strong supporters of Rowling, and tough on Steve Vander Ark. This no one can deny. It is also true that Anelli herself has a good relationship with Rowling, and is writing a book, on fandom, with her blessing. These are the facts - and I didn’t refer to her as having mushroom hair, so she ought be happy.
Perhaps I will end with a para that was cut from the piece that seems to capture things:
Sheryll Townsend, a forty-eight year old Slytherin and fellow member of Harry Potter for Grownups (she calls herself a “list elf”), said, “Fandom tends to eat their own.”
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
unapologetic - Music:Coldplay "In My Place"
I just transcribed part of Pottercast 148 from Leaky Cauldron, since they can't seem to agree on who said what, and I wanted to hear it for myself. I think the problem that Tim Wu had, and that I had, is that Melissa and Sue sound rather similar when they only give one word answers such as "right." That implies that they agree, whether they do or not. There is no way to prove who is agreeing, whether Melissa or Sue.
John Noe speaks the most, Melissa talks about her book, so we know that is her, and , from comments I've read on Leaky, it is Sue who makes the actual statement about Steve being "vilified" by fandom. So Tim Wu may have to make a correction to that article, but it's obviously all the same because no one argues a different side in this part of the Podcast.
This is the first time I've ever listened to a Pottercast before, although I've read the transcripts. I admit I didn't listen to the whole thing. I think I'd rather have a long slow root canal.
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
working - Music:After the Fire "Der Kommissar"
The Bench: Fan Feud by Tim Wu
I'm glad he didn't call it "Family Feud" although it does have quite a bit of "Mom likes you best" in it!
I posted this link in the Leaky Lounge, then ran for my life.
Update: Melissa Anelli has written a first impression of this article on Leaky Cauldron:
( Read it Here )
This is just made of Drama.
- Location:Fandom-with-Popcorn
- Mood:
impressed - Music:Ned Nash Orchestra "Hang Em High"
Excerpts:
"...when Rapoport received a series of threatening letters last fall from lawyers . . . he didn't flinch.Added: There are two pages of Comments that really display every opinion of this case.
'The intimidation factor was zero,' Rapoport said with quiet pugnacity."
~~~~~~~
Rowling seemed willing to compromise on the witness stand, saying, "I never ever once wanted to stop Mr. Vander Ark from doing his own guide, never ever. Do your book, but, please, change it so it does not take as much of my work."
. . . "That opportunity was never presented to us," he (Rappoport) said, his eyes flashing with anger. "The only thing they said [in the lawyer letters and pretrial discussions] was: 'Will you stop the book?' "
~~~~~~~
. . . the publisher said he has never been worried about the ultimate outcome. His lawyers, he said, have told him that "no court has ever ruled that the writer of a fictional work is the only person who can write about that book."
~~~~~~~
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
working - Music:John Mellencamp "Crumblin' Down"
First, a big thank you to Steve for giving my "research group" credit on the Lexicon Website for finding an online source for the word "Alohomora." I'm honored, and I know everyone else will be also!
You can go back and see our work HERE.
I found a little more information today to back up what we found last week, and to confirm that "Sikidy" Geomancy is practiced in East Africa, while other forms come from West Africa.
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
cheerful - Music:Jimmy Buffett "Boat Drinks"
These just came out yesterday and I think they're so beautiful! These are for the "adult" book covers, I guess copying the British idea.
The motifs would make great icons as well. The snake is for Order of the Phoenix and the spilled Goblet is from Half-Blood Prince.
. . . . .
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
mellow - Music:Hollies "Bus Stop"
In the HP books, there are many questionable juvenile jokes, from Ron making remarks about "Uranus" in Divination class, to George considering himself "holy" now that his ear is gone, to Percy being teased as "Bighead Boy" by his brothers. The name "Harry Potter" is euphemistic and just barely passes the censors. And the fact is, most HP fans appreciate a good joke, the sillier the better.
So when I read last week that JKR and her witnesses do not appreciate the "facetious asides" in the Lexicon, it seemed rather incredible. And when you read the transcript and see what the objections were, it's really funny. Recall that Harry himself thinks that Hagrid is "too large to be allowed," Yet JKR said:
A. (JKR) For that money, I believe you are being resold the Harry
15 Potter books with a negligible amount of attempted commentary,
16 some of it false, and a lot of facetious comments. I quote,
17 "I would like to see Hagrid fit himself into a McDonald's booth."
That was a remark Steve put in the Lexicon book. I fail to see why that would bother JKR, unless she hasn't been to McDonald's lately and tried to sit in a narrow plastic booth. It makes me wonder, have the books suddenly turned into "sacred texts" so that we can't joke about them?
Witness for the Plaintiff Jeri Johnson was on the stand complaining of some rather mild jokes Steve Vander Ark makes in the Lexicon book, and the Judge saw right through it to the heart of the matter and chimed in:
Q. (Hammer) You are an Oxford don, are you not?
9 (Johnson) A. I am.
10 Q. Many of the readers of the Harry Potter books are 12, 13,
11 14-year-olds, isn't that true?
12 A. Yes.
13 THE COURT (Judge): Or younger.
14 Q. Or younger.
15 The Harry Potter books are filled with jokes, are they
16 not, that are directed at 10, 11, 12 and 13-year-olds, correct?
17 A. Yes, there are.
18 Q. In fact, there are jokes about troll boogers, isn't that
19 true?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. There are jokes about phlegm, isn't that true?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. You, I assume, don't often joke about phlegm, correct?
24 A. Only with my 9-year-old daughter.
25 Q. So, in fact, you yourself recognize that a 9-year-old might
1 find something funny that you yourself do not?
2 A. Absolutely.
Absolutely right. In the books there are also jokes about toilet seats, and jokes about an old man with nothing on under a dress so air can get to his privates. There are jokes about Moaning Myrtle getting into the bathtub with Harry. Sirius jokes about Kreacher snogging a pair of pants. Gilderoy Lockhart tells Snape that his "wand is a little over-excited." And how can we forget all the "goat jokes" about Aberforth? Are those stories not meant to be "facetious asides"?
Really humor is the last thing they should have brought up because parody is protected under copyright law, and the way things are going, that may be the only legal way anyone can express an opinion eventually.
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
quixotic - Music:Beatles: "Magical Mystery Tour"
Author Orson Scott Card, who also wrote so eloquently about Severus Snape before DH:
J.K. Rowling, Lexicon and Oz
"I fully expect that the outcome of this lawsuit will be:
1. Publication of Lexicon will go on without any problem or prejudice, because it clearly falls within the copyright law's provision for scholarly work, commentary and review.
2. Rowling will be forced to pay Steven Vander Ark's legal fees, since her suit was utterly without merit from the start.
3. People who hear about this suit will have a sour taste in their mouth about Rowling from now on. Her Cinderella story once charmed us. Her greedy evil-witch behavior now disgusts us. And her next book will be perceived as the work of that evil witch. "
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
working - Music:Fleetwood Mac "Gold Dust Woman"
A. I think that it is sloppy, I think there is very little
4 research, and I don't think that it -- I don't think it
5 constitutes an original work.
6 Q. You mentioned that the Lexicon occasionally -- earlier that
7 the Lexicon occasionally contained etymologies.
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. I believe you also mentioned that the some of those
10 etymologies were wrong?
11 A. Hmm-hmm.
12 Q. Could you give the Court an example.
13 A. I could give several. But Mr. Vander Ark gives an
14 etymology for alohomora, which is an incantation used within
15 the Harry Potter books to open a locked door by magic. And he
16 asserts that this word was derived from the Hawaiian aloha
17 meaning good-bye. Which is errant nonsense. Alohomora is a
18 Sidiki word from West Africa, and it is a term used in
19 geomancy. It is a figure -- the figure alohomora means in
20 Sidiki "favorable to thieves." Which is obviously a very
21 appropriate meaning for a spell that enables you to unlock a
22 locked door by magic.
That's all very interesting, but is it realistic that someone could find that on the Internet without the use of some obscure source? Steve used "Aloha" as the etymological source, the Hawaiian word for both "good-bye" and "hello," which makes sense when dealing with opening doors. I always thought that was the root word for Alohomora until reading in the news that the writer had a different view.
I disagree that this is "sloppy research" though, and my own experience in trying to go on a quest for alohomoro is probably typical. I invite anyone who can actually find this root word to please post it here and tell me where they found it, or if anyone else is searching, let us know if you came closer than I did.
UPDATE: Ding Ding and Ta Da!!! We have a winner! An anonymous, but very lucky researcher discovered the source for Alohomora! And her name is "Marielle." Also thanks to
Whoo-Hoo! So here's the Magic Link: http://www.serenapowers.com/sikidy.html

And another, which says "See Aloha" - *lol* : http://www.mysteryarts.com/magic/words/E
As you see, you have to spell it "Sikidy" instead of "Sidiky." That is probably a court transcription error. Sikidy is not a dialect but a type of divination used on the Island of Madagascar. I had seen some links leading to that yesterday while researching Geomancy, but dismissed them because . . . that is East Africa, not West Africa. So even with the supposed location of the name origin, this was a challenge to unravel just from what the author said. I don't know why "alohomora" doesn't show up on Search Engines from that website - it's odd, but I just searched for it again, and got nothing except references to the HP books. Anyway, this has been alot of fun and thanks to all who did the research!
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
geeky - Music:Don McClean "American Pie"
In honor of that, I thought I'd post a few comments about the Lexicon case from various sources, from Neil Gaiman to Entertainment Weekly, and more:
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
cheerful - Music:Traveling Wilburys "Rattled"
- Location:Home
- Mood:
ecstatic
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
busy - Music:Madonna "La Isla Bonita"
Ten Commandments of Trying a Case as Set Forth by Yours Truly Bluestocking.
Also, here's a hilarious story from 1945, back when the Marx Brothers were making a movie called "A Night in Casablanca" and Warner Brothers told them the name was too similar to the Humphrey Bogart picture "Casablanca." Groucho Marx wrote numerous letters trying to explain, each letter more bizarre than the next, until finally the legal department at WB left them alone to make their movie.
Groucho Marx Confuses the WB Legal Department
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
mischievous - Music:The Ventures "Hawaii Five-O" (Aloha)
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
moody - Music:Gordon Lightfoot - "Don Quixote"
I never ever once wanted to stop Mr. Vander Ark from doing his own guide — never ever," she said as she took the stand for the second time in the three-day trial, as the last rebuttal witness. "Do your book, but please, change it so it does not take as much of my work."
The problem is, she never said that before. And she definitely wanted to stop Mr. Vander Ark and RDR books.
In this document, Filing 59, which is her pretrial letter to the court, JKR states
"RDR's position that fans of the HP Series can simply buy two encyclopedias is both presumptuous and insensitive."
So, if even "two" encyclopedias are too many, then she is contradicting herself in saying she would allow another version of the Lexicon. In court on Monday, according to Melissa Anelli's trial notes, Here, the testimony said:
So, did she change her mind from Monday until Wednesday? I'm not sure you can suddenly change your mind in the middle of a trial, especially if you are one of the Plaintiffs. Or was she trying to save face with the Judge by softening her stance? Either way, let's hope they settle this soon.
- Location:Fandom
- Mood:
working - Music:Billy Kramer "Bad to Me"






